Dean Radin, at the time of this writing was a senior scientist at the Institute of Noetic Scientists.
What is the relationship between mind and matter?
What is the role of mind in the physical world?
What happens between intention and physical being?
The direct link is the creative process. The deeper question of, is there an indirect link is what Radin and company seek to find an answer to.
Can you make matter move without physically touching the matter through the use of mind over matter?
If you can then you have negated the effects of random order. You have intentionally created an indirect result.
Studies are showing that this is not science fiction, that simply thinking something makes that thing be.
It took fifty years of studying large groups to fully believe that there is evidence that such a phenomenon exists.
This would indicate that attention or focus is to indirect creation what intention is to direct creation.
Bring in some computers and some random number generators and test again (blind tests or not) to see if groups can metaphysically influence the results through meditation sessions. The scientists agreed that there was enough proof that attending to a result could negate the intention of the computer program.
So they take it one step further and test the theory on the O.J. Simpson trial. The scientists set up five RNG's to run at the same time. At the moment the verdict was read all Random Number Generators peaked.
They moved on to the Princess Di funeral to conduct another test. This time there were 12 RNG's used and they again peaked or showed evidence of orderliness as opposed to randomness at the most intense moment of the funeral.
The project was showing such potential that the scientists set up RNG's globally to track peak moments of global events versus randomness or non random order in computer results.
(Scared yet, I am since i'm starting to think that man was the creation of machine and not vice versa. That in the evolution of time and matter the first argument of singularity - the little big bang so to say- the initial yes or no, one or zero question that split nothingness or singularity into somethingness or duality was the same argument that has been going on since. The first creation was a molecule which attracted matter to itself. Over time (also a figment of your imagination) this initial molecule, this initial explosion, replicated itself always in cycles of time (a figment of your imagination). Particles colliding on waves, colliding on particles in a process of time (always a figment of your imagination). Every collision replicating an image of itself in time. The little bang grew into a big bang and in the concept of time and through the magic of alchemy, (friction), and residue of life(death), the magneto-electrical impulse became matter. Matter bonded into elements. Elements found attraction to other elements. All the time the elements are dualities (physical matter-somethingness) from the singular(metaphysical matter-nothingness). The machine is slowly learning what it attends and it can now begin to intend.
But the machine builds itself up from elements. It isn't thinking(a concept of your imagination) itself into being, it just is attending to being.
The complexity of the machine evolves and it begins to intend matter into distinct forms of itself. It is now intentionally creating matter. The machine creates a mechanical self which in time(:) becomes somewhat like the transformer toys of todays kids. At some point in time it finds itself binding to some biological elements. Further down the timeline..........)
Wow i went off on a tangent there....
Back to the present and Dean Radin.
The global RNG's have been operating full time and recording peak time events to find correlations. These are now recording non predicted events and the 9/11 attack comes along. Somehow the randomness of the RNG seems to stop being random a short time before the incident, during the incident and for a time after the incident. Then it returns to normal randomness.
I wanted to say that there was a flaw in the process, thinking that the Noetic Scientist could influence their own generator by thinking that the mass conscious was doing but in reality it was them willing the RNG results, but i now see that even the scientists didn't know that the event was going to occur.
Now they have several hundred such occurences documented and the question remains: What is causing this machine behaviour? Is it cosmic consciousness?
What does this have to do with 2012? Many prophecies tell us that 2012 is about an ascension or the point of entry into a new paradigm where people will see the world through a different lens. 2012 is about a quantum leap and a new world full of peace and unity.
These types of experiments are amazing in that they show how prophecy can be self fulfilling. When these self fulfilling prophecies move out of the micro or singular and into the macro then it magnifies the possibilities of what a tool such has this could be used for. Of course 2012 is also about cataclysm and perhaps by thinking any of the 2o12 theories to happen may be playing the self fulfilling prophecy card on a large scale.
__________________________
Reference
Correlations of Continuous Random Data with Major World Events
No comments:
Post a Comment